Agreement and disagreement utterance detection in conversational speech by extracting and integrating local features
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper presents a novel framework to automatically detect agreement and disagreement utterances in natural conversation. Such a function is critical for conversation understanding such as meeting summarization. One of the difficulties of agreement and disagreement utterance detection in natural conversation is ambiguity in the utterance unit. Utterances are usually segmented by short pauses. However, in conversations, multiple sentences are often uttered in one breath. Such utterances exhibit the characteristics of agreement and disagreement only in some parts, not the whole utterance. This makes conventional methods problematic since they assume each utterance is just one sentence and extract global features from the whole utterance. To deal with this problem, we propose a detection framework that utilizes only local prosodic/lexical features. The local features are extracted from short windows that cover just a few words. Posteriors of agreement, disagreement and others are estimated window-by-window and integrated to yield a final decision. Experiments on free discussion speech show that the proposed method, through its use of local features, offers significantly higher accuracy in detecting agreement and disagreement utterances.
منابع مشابه
Identifying Agreement and Disagreement in Conversational Speech: Use of Bayesian Networks to Model Pragmatic Dependencies
We describe a statistical approach for modeling agreements and disagreements in conversational interaction. Our approach first identifies adjacency pairs using maximum entropy ranking based on a set of lexical, durational, and structural features that look both forward and backward in the discourse. We then classify utterances as agreement or disagreement using these adjacency pairs and feature...
متن کاملIdentifying Agreement/Disagreement in Conversational Speech: A Cross-Lingual Study
This paper presents models for detecting agreement/disagreement between speakers in English and Arabic broadcast conversation shows. We explore a variety of features, including lexical, structural, durational, and prosodic features. We experiment with these features using Conditional Random Fields models and conduct systematic investigations on efficacy of various feature groups across language...
متن کاملPragmatic Criteria in the Holistic and Analytic Rating of the Disagreement Speech Act of Iranian EFL Learners by Non-native English Speaking Teachers
onveying a strong message within a language stems from not only a linguistically appropriate utterance but also a pragmatically appropriate discourse. Broadly considering various facets of pragmatics, pragmatic assessment has not been potentially brought into perspective. To address this discourse gap, this study, guided by the principles of mixed-method design, pursued three purposes: ...
متن کاملاثر طول گفته بر روانی گفتار خودانگیخته کودکان و بزرگسالان لکنتی فارسی زبان
Objective: recently, researchers have increasingly turned to study the relation between stuttering and utterance length. This study investigates the effect of utterance length on the amount of speech dysfluency in stuttering Persian-speaking children and adults in conversational speech. The obtained results can pave the way to reach a better understanding of stuttering of child and adults, as w...
متن کاملRecognizing the Emotional State Changes in Human Utterance by a Learning Statistical Method based on Gaussian Mixture Model
Speech is one of the most opulent and instant methods to express emotional characteristics of human beings, which conveys the cognitive and semantic concepts among humans. In this study, a statistical-based method for emotional recognition of speech signals is proposed, and a learning approach is introduced, which is based on the statistical model to classify internal feelings of the utterance....
متن کامل